So this is what constitutes a “clean campaign?”
By Zach W On March 31, 2009 · 1 Comment · In Election 2009, Hypocrisy, Those Kooky Conservatives!, Video, Wisconsin Politics
Down at the bottom of Judge Randy Koschnick’s Supreme Court campaign website, there’s a clean campaign ticker counting down the days since Judge Koschnick invited Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson to sign a clean campaign pledge. According to Judge Koschnick’s website, Judge Koschnick “said he believes the two can disagree while maintaining a high level of decorum.”
What I’m wondering is if the following ad is in keeping with the notion of “disagreeing while maintaining a high level of decorum:”
For a candidate who seemed so intent on making sure both sides ran a clean campaign, Randy Koschnick sure doesn’t seem to want to make sure his side of the race runs a clean campaign.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
opinions powered by SendLove.to
One Response to So this is what constitutes a “clean campaign?”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Our Blogroll
- AFSCME Council 24 SEPAC
- Badger Blue, Times Two
- Badger Democracy
- BattiestGrrl Recalls: Putting the 'All' in 'Recall'
- blue cheddar blog
- Blue Collar Blogger
- Brett Cottrell
- Brew City Brawler
- Caffeinated Politics
- City of Contempt – The Scroll of Reason
- Cognitive Dissidence
- Constructive Debate
- Democracy Interactive
- Down With Tyranny!
- Eschaton
- Eye on Wisconsin
- FDLFVR
- Firedoglake
- First Draft
- folkbum’s rambles and rants
- Forward our Motto
- ForwardSeeking
- FoxPolitics.net
- Freak Out Nation
- freshthoughtz
- Grassroots Tosa
- Haas414
- Happy Circumstance
- illusory tenant
- Jake's Economic TA Funhouse
- Labor Chicks
- Left on the Lake
- Left Take
- Letter From Here
- Mildly Relevant
- MisLeading Wisconsin
- Moneyed Politicians
- Monologues of Dissent
- One Wisconsin Now
- Plaisted Writes
- Playground Politics
- Political Heat
- Ramona's Voices
- Red State Progressive
- Sly in the Morning
- South Milwaukee's 4th District
- The Bearded Crank
- The Blue States
- The Chief
- The Lost Albatross
- The Masses
- The Motley Cow
- The Other Side of My Mouth
- The Paul Ryan Watch
- The Plum Line
- The Political Carnival
- The Political Environment
- The Sara Schulz Show
- The World According to Nick
- Turning Over the Rocks
- Uppity Wisconsin
- Urban Milwaukee
- Waukesha Wonk
- Wisconsin Gazette
- WisPolitics.com
Watch the GAB sort through recall petitions LIVE!
Join the Discussion…
- Zach W on Save the date: Tammy Baldwin’s coming to Waukesha County!
- jimspice on New Walker tool: The WisDems’ Interactive Map of Corruption
- Megan on On Obama’s SuperPAC About-Face
- james booth on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- james booth on Verify the “Verify the Recall”
- gnarlytrombone on No Recourse for Known Recall Petition Irregularities?
- james booth on No Recourse for Known Recall Petition Irregularities?
- Lisa Mux on New Walker tool: The WisDems’ Interactive Map of Corruption
- Jeebus on “Ignore the Public Comments”
- Lisa Mux on New Walker tool: The WisDems’ Interactive Map of Corruption
- Gee on New Walker tool: The WisDems’ Interactive Map of Corruption
- gnarlytrombone on No Recourse for Known Recall Petition Irregularities?
- Steven Reynolds on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- kim on No Recourse for Known Recall Petition Irregularities?
- kim on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
Site Login
Well, his case citations are not clean.
I would have hoped that someone running for the Wisconsin Supreme Court would be able to follow the Wisconsin Supreme Court rules for case citation (SCR 80.001. Notice Koschnick’s ad “State v. Post, 541 N.W.2d 115, 197 Wis. 2d 279 (Wis. 1995).” The Wisconsin Reporter should be cited prior to the Northwestern Reporter for State v. Post. When the Wisconsin Reporter is cited the “Wis.” abbreviation is not necessary. Thus, the correct cite should be: State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 541 N.W.2d 115 (1995). The public domain cite is also incorrect, The “(Wis. 2002)” is unncessary because the year and the court are provided by the public domain cite “2002 WI 81″
Maybe I’m just being petty but I think an individual that is running for the oppurtunity to write decisions on behalf of the State of Wisconsin should follow the rules for proper citation for those decisions.