Good luck getting the Catholic vote, Mark!
As reported by Michael Horne, Republican gubernatorial candidate Mark Neumann is a parishoner at Christ Church, Pewaukee, which is affiliated with the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS). Additionally, Neumann serves on the board of Hope Christian Schools. Now in and of itself, those facts aren’t really shocking, but here’s the kicker: the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod also includes a biography of Neumann on its website, a website that also includes this interesting piece of Q&A:
“Q. What is the official stand of the WELS about who is the antichrist. Our pastor says it is the Pope.”
“A. Our doctrinal position is that the Roman papacy has exposed itself and is to be recognized as the Antichrist.”
So I’m wondering….does Mark Neumann believe the Pope is the antichrist? Further, if Neumann does believe the Pope is the antichrist, how does he feel about all those Catholics in Wisconsin? Is Neumann ready to write off the Catholic vote in Wisconsin, or will he try to distance himself from the views of his Synod simply to make himself more electable?
EDIT: Post edited to include a source link to the Q&A on the WELS website.
11 Responses to Good luck getting the Catholic vote, Mark!
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Watch the GAB sort through recall petitions LIVE!
Our Blogroll
- AFSCME Council 24 SEPAC
- Badger Blue, Times Two
- Badger Democracy
- BattiestGrrl Recalls: Putting the 'All' in 'Recall'
- blue cheddar blog
- Blue Collar Blogger
- Brett Cottrell
- Brew City Brawler
- Caffeinated Politics
- City of Contempt – The Scroll of Reason
- Cognitive Dissidence
- Constructive Debate
- Democracy Interactive
- Down With Tyranny!
- Eschaton
- Eye on Wisconsin
- FDLFVR
- Firedoglake
- First Draft
- folkbum’s rambles and rants
- Forward our Motto
- FoxPolitics.net
- Freak Out Nation
- freshthoughtz
- Grassroots Tosa
- Haas414
- Happy Circumstance
- illusory tenant
- Jake's Economic TA Funhouse
- Left on the Lake
- Left Take
- Letter From Here
- Mildly Relevant
- MisLeading Wisconsin
- Moneyed Politicians
- Monologues of Dissent
- One Wisconsin Now
- Plaisted Writes
- Playground Politics
- Political Heat
- Ramona's Voices
- Red State Progressive
- Sly in the Morning
- South Milwaukee's 4th District
- The Bearded Crank
- The Blue States
- The Chief
- The Lost Albatross
- The Masses
- The Motley Cow
- The Other Side of My Mouth
- The Paul Ryan Watch
- The Plum Line
- The Political Carnival
- The Political Environment
- The Sara Schulz Show
- The World According to Nick
- Turning Over the Rocks
- Uppity Wisconsin
- Urban Milwaukee
- Waukesha Wonk
- Wisconsin Gazette
- WisPolitics.com
Join the Discussion…
- Dan on Why I’d vote for Jan Pierce if I lived in the 14th Aldermanic District
- Super Id on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Zach W on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Super Id on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Super Id on Carolina Stark: Judges Matter
- Super Id on Carolina Stark edges out Walker appointee in Circuit Court race
- LikeaHawk on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- Jeff Simpson on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- LikeaHawk on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- Jeff Simpson on Verify The Recall – It’s Working
- Jeff Simpson on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Greg on Cat’s out of the bag! Secretary of State Doug La Follette plans to run for governor!
- Former Republican on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Zach W on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- Jeff Simpson on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
Site Login


Nice job taking something out of context to make a sensational display. At least Horne gave links to the source document. Since you’re a theologist now, please explain what was said there.
Are you willing to stake your reputation on this post?
Cindy, I’ve added a link to the actual source material; that was an oversight on my part, but thanks for pointing it out.
As to your comment, what am I taking out of context? “Our doctrinal position is that the Roman papacy has exposed itself and is to be recognized as the Antichrist” seems pretty straightforward to me.
Further, this Statement on the Antichrist seems to make it clear where WELS stands on the issue:
Cindy, if I’m confused or have misinterpreted what I’ve read, then by all means correct me. I don’t profess to be an expert on the issue of religion, especially the Lutheran faith, but the comments I’ve cited seem pretty unambiguous.
Zach’s correct. The pope has been called an anti-christ by other christians through-out the history of christianity. A simple cross check on Wiki can confirm this. I hope you retract your attack on Zach, Cindy.
Oh Zach…I went to a WELS school from 1-10th grade and was baptised and confirmed in a WELS church and look at how nice I am.
Anon, you are nice, and that’s why you’re valued as one of my 3.4 regular readers.
I thought Barack Obama was the antichrist? I’m so confused!
How is this any different than the Catholic church’s claim that it is the only church established by Christ and that if you are not a member, you are not a valid Christian. But I don’t have any problem voting for Cathloic candidates who are active in their churches. I don’t hold Russ Feingold accountable for Judiasm’s belief that Jesus was a false prophet, etc.
And you are taking the WELS comment out of context because you do not show their definition of an anti-christ:
“There are two points which by themselves are enough to make the pope an antichrist. First, he makes himself God when he takes to himself the right to make divine laws binding on the church. It is a sin to eat meat on Friday. Then it isn’t. Priests are denied marriage, a gift of God. The list goes on and on. Here the pope denies the authority of God the Father. Second, he curses anyone who believe the most important teaching of the Bible, forgiveness of sins by grace alone by faith alone. He denies the essence of the work of Christ, God the Son. These two teachings make the pope an antichrist.”
But more importantly, what is your point? So there are many differences between religions and denominations. How is this valid to an electing someone for Govenor???
If you look at recent Catholic social teaching, Neumann’s political positions are probably closest to what the Catholic Church teaches and prioritizes, which is not saying much at all. All three of the major probable candidates (Doyle, Neumann, Walker), in my opinion, are seriously problematic, and if it is Doyle vs. Neumann or Walker I will be doing a write-in vote, either John Huebscher or Tony Staskunas.
Jason, depending on who you’re talking to, President Obama is the antichrist!
Thanks Zach. That was so very kind of you to say.
Actually, I was raised going to a WELS church and school but I decided not to be part of WELS once I was able to make my own decisions.
According to Mel Sanger, Obama is the anti-christ. http://www.antichristidentity.com/