From lobbyists’ pens to legislators’ lips
Did you ever notice how remarkably similar the speeches given by lawmakers on the issue of health care reform happened to sound? While it would be easy to chalk the similarities up to the use of talking points issued by each side, the similarities may in fact stem from the fact that perhaps as many as four dozen lawmakers from both parties had their health care reform statements written by lobbyists:
Statements by more than a dozen lawmakers were ghostwritten, in whole or in part, by Washington lobbyists working for Genentech, one of the world’s largest biotechnology companies.
E-mail messages obtained by The New York Times show that the lobbyists drafted one statement for Democrats and another for Republicans.
The lobbyists, employed by Genentech and by two Washington law firms, were remarkably successful in getting the statements printed in the Congressional Record under the names of different members of Congress.
Genentech, a subsidiary of the Swiss drug giant Roche, estimates that 42 House members picked up some of its talking points — 22 Republicans and 20 Democrats, an unusual bipartisan coup for lobbyists.
At least Democrats and Republicans can agree on something – namely that using lobbyists to write your statements is a great idea!
2 Responses to From lobbyists’ pens to legislators’ lips
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Our Blogroll
- AFSCME Council 24 SEPAC
- Badger Blue, Times Two
- Badger Democracy
- BattiestGrrl Recalls: Putting the 'All' in 'Recall'
- blue cheddar blog
- Blue Collar Blogger
- Brett Cottrell
- Brew City Brawler
- Caffeinated Politics
- City of Contempt – The Scroll of Reason
- Cognitive Dissidence
- Constructive Debate
- Democracy Interactive
- Down With Tyranny!
- Eschaton
- Eye on Wisconsin
- FDLFVR
- Firedoglake
- First Draft
- folkbum’s rambles and rants
- Forward our Motto
- ForwardSeeking
- FoxPolitics.net
- Freak Out Nation
- freshthoughtz
- Grassroots Tosa
- Haas414
- Happy Circumstance
- illusory tenant
- Jake's Economic TA Funhouse
- Labor Chicks
- Left on the Lake
- Left Take
- Letter From Here
- Mildly Relevant
- MisLeading Wisconsin
- Moneyed Politicians
- Monologues of Dissent
- One Wisconsin Now
- Plaisted Writes
- Playground Politics
- Political Heat
- Ramona's Voices
- Red State Progressive
- Sly in the Morning
- South Milwaukee's 4th District
- The Bearded Crank
- The Blue States
- The Chief
- The Lost Albatross
- The Masses
- The Motley Cow
- The Other Side of My Mouth
- The Paul Ryan Watch
- The Plum Line
- The Political Carnival
- The Political Environment
- The Sara Schulz Show
- The World According to Nick
- Turning Over the Rocks
- Uppity Wisconsin
- Urban Milwaukee
- Waukesha Wonk
- Wisconsin Gazette
- WisPolitics.com
Watch the GAB sort through recall petitions LIVE!
Join the Discussion…
- Q on Falk to hold “Your Voice, Your Wisconsin” campaign announcement tour
- Zach W on “Ignore the Public Comments”
- jimspice on “Ignore the Public Comments”
- Jeff Simpson on Peter, Paul & Debbie
- Ed Heinzelman on Peter, Paul & Debbie
- John on The Commercial
- Zuma Bound on Scott Walker’s Inconsistency
- jeff simpson on Scott Walker’s Inconsistency
- james booth on Scott Walker’s Inconsistency
- jeff simpson on Scott Walker’s Inconsistency
- james booth on Scott Walker’s Inconsistency
- jeff simpson on Scott Walker’s Inconsistency
- Publius No. 9 on The Commercial
- james booth on Scott Walker’s Inconsistency
- Zach W on Republican Rep. John Fleming cites The Onion as factual news
Site Login


What was different about the statements they drafted for each party?
That’s just lazy. Couldn’t they even be bothered to retype it (or cut and paste) and slap it on their own letterhead. {Figuratively speaking of course.}
Um – verbatim talking points should be the least of our concerns. How about verbatim legislation – considering lobbyists commonly write large chunks of what “our” Congress passes. And it’s not like the people we voted for actually read the bills anyway.