Comments on: The conservative definition of a union thug

By: Jan Tessier

Jan Tessier — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:45:01 +0000

Here we have a country driven into debt by conservatives and their policies. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/69xx/doc6982/12-15-LongTermOutlook.pdf
These policies have destroyed the middle class. Wages have stagnated, while productivity has increased. We have ultra-wealthy people (Koch Brothers, anyone?) funneling billions into right-wing PACs, Ayn Randian think-tanks, and campaigns in order to kill what few programs still exist to help working America.
And these shitheads above are spouting Fox News talking points about union thuggery?
I repeat my assertion that being a right-winger means one is a member of a cult. They all say the same lies. They all use the same lying talking points. They all believe they are correct and everyone else is wrong.
Not one of these people above have read history that hasn’t been adulterated by some right-wing shithead. Isn’t that the truth, fellas? I bet you all believe Sarah Palin’s version of Paul Revere’s ride, too.
I don’t argue with these idiots anymore. They’re entrenched in their beliefs. Nothing will change their minds.

1 likes

By: forgotmyscreenname

forgotmyscreenname — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:52:41 +0000

Voice an opinion contrary to the union: have your business boycotted (even if that position is to stay netural and not take a political position). If you are an elected official and have a opinion that differs from the union you will be unnecessarily recalled. Union memeber can’t voice an opinion that is contrary to the union because their money is confiscated and used as the union sees fit. At least under the new law public workers can choose to be in the union and choose to have their money deducted (now if only private workers had that choice). What great pro-choice legislation!

0 likes

By: Cleary

Cleary — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 14:41:55 +0000

I see I’m late to this party, but what the heck: As a conservative, I can tell you that your definition is all wet. A “union thug” is a thug who happens to show (largely unthinking) allegiance to unions generally, and his or her union specifically. A “union thug” uses any or all of these “tactics:” thuggery, intimidation, extortion, bullying, shouting-down others, and outright violence as a means of getting his or her union’s preferences to prevail. A “union thug” will stand outside a corporate exec’s home picketing, even if there are small children there. And we know that unionists never turn into mobs and break store windows, etc.), which is a real concern if their standing outside someone’s home. Thus, not all unionists are thugs, but if you are OK with those who are, you might as well be labeled as such. And I would say virtually every single union thug (and most every “loyal” unionist) is a liberal, progressive, socialist, communist hack, who has no idea about how to compete in the market in a mode of self-reliance.

0 likes

By: Locke

Locke — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:19:39 +0000

Sorry for that missing tag – really wish there was a preview option here. Not complaining – I appreciate the forum for discussion, just a friendly suggestion.

0 likes

By: Locke

Locke — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:12:45 +0000

Was going to leave this topic alone figuring no good could come from it. But then I just saw an article that really fits. Are all union members lazy or thugs? Of course not. But is the sort of thing I would classify as thug-like behavior.

Seems a kid put 200 hours of work in to clearing a walking/biking path in an Allentown park for his Eagle Scout service project. The local SEIU is complaining and considering filing a grievance with the city.

“We’ll be looking into the Cub Scout or Boy Scout who did the trails,” Balzano [president of the union] told the council.” Balzano said Saturday he isn’t targeting Boy Scouts. But given the city’s decision in July to lay off 39 SEIU members, Balzano said “there’s to be no volunteers.” No one except union members may pick up a hoe or shovel, plant a flower or clear a walking path.

Wouldn’t you agree that this is bullying behavior? The “if we aren’t paid to do it, nobody can do it” attitude is just unreasonable and by being so absolute about it, so afraid to give an inch because of the slippery slope argument, they come of looking foolish.

0 likes

By: forgotmyscreenname

forgotmyscreenname — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:39:07 +0000

My point was how idiotic it is for you to pose that definition of all conservatives. Isn’t that seeing everything in black and white, as you criticize me of doing? I never said all union members were thugs.

I just meant there is a mentality among many union workers that they are always getting the shaft, that they are the “little guy” and someone else is to blame for them not getting more. “Union school” would be the union bosses fostering that kind of atmosphere. But they have to. In order for them to stay in charge, they need to create dissatisfaction so that they can go out and deliver year after year. I wonder if there is ever a point where utopia would be reached, or would the unions keep fighting for a four day weekend, health benefits for the dog and cat, and a hot tub in every backyard.

I would call benefits the auto workers received pretty generous, but I still bet some of them spent a lot of time complaining that they got a raw deal. In fact some of those benefits were so generous they helped tank the company (one factor, not the only factor).

Unions had a time and place, but I think that time has passed. I do think unions protect some who do not deserve protecting, but I do not think all union workers are lazy. My problem is more with the unions themselves, who use union dues for political purposes and members who disagree have little choice, and the strangehold they hold over members, the intimidation tactics and environment they create. And yes I have a problem with union members who buy into it all and the thugs who will defend such an institution at all costs.

And before you say unions have created unity and looking out for your fellow worker, I have seen time after time that members with more seniority are more than willing to sacrifice the guys at the bottom losing their jobs in exchange for increased benefits (one example, Doyle and the furloughs). Sure unions gave us the 40 hour work week, but since then they have done more harm than good to American manufacturing.

0 likes

By: Zach W

Zach W — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:07:35 +0000

forgot, my point was to show just how idiotic it sounds for you to talk about “union thug school” as if such a thing actually exists.

See, this is precisely what’s wrong with too many folks….you see everything as a black and white issue instead of realizing things can have a bit of nuance. You call all union members “union thugs,” and I say there are plenty of us who realize unions have their positives and negatives and who don’t always toe the union line.

For example:

Do unions protect some workers who are lazy and who shouldn’t be allowed to keep their jobs? YES.

Are all union members lazy? ABSOLUTELY NOT.

I know it’s easy for conservatives to demonize labor unions as an example of everything that’s wrong with this country right now, but let’s just remember that this nation is what it is in large part thanks to the contributions of union members.

0 likes

By: forgotmyscreenname

forgotmyscreenname — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:59:46 +0000

Must you take everything so literally? lol… I’m sure if there was such a school, you would have passed with flying colors!

0 likes

By: Zach W

Zach W — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:39:16 +0000

“I know they teach that “hate the rich/the company I work for/class warfare” mentality in union thug school…”

Hmmm….I haven’t been to union thug school, and I’m pretty involved in my union. It’s weird that they’ve never mentioned union thug school to me.

0 likes

By: Zach W

Zach W — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:34:18 +0000

forgot, I wouldn’t consider anyone making a dollar more than me to be rich.

0 likes