Comments on: The “Twelve Gaffes of Tommy” http://bloggingblue.com/2009/11/30/the-twelve-gaffes-of-tommy/ Blogging Liberally in the Badger State Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:38:56 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Tommy Thompson: It may happen « The Sconz http://bloggingblue.com/2009/11/30/the-twelve-gaffes-of-tommy/comment-page-1/#comment-18349 Tommy Thompson: It may happen « The Sconz Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:28:43 +0000 http://bloggingblue.com/?p=7301#comment-18349 [...] debater, so Tommy will not be able to win on name recognition a lone. He’d have to bring it. No excuses about hearing aids or diarrhea. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)How did the crazies come to Wisconsin?No, [...] [...] debater, so Tommy will not be able to win on name recognition a lone. He’d have to bring it. No excuses about hearing aids or diarrhea. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)How did the crazies come to Wisconsin?No, [...]

]]> By: Zach W http://bloggingblue.com/2009/11/30/the-twelve-gaffes-of-tommy/comment-page-1/#comment-16225 Zach W Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:18:59 +0000 http://bloggingblue.com/?p=7301#comment-16225 Tommy's not a threat - he's just a source of amusement. Tommy’s not a threat – he’s just a source of amusement.

]]> By: Zach W http://bloggingblue.com/2009/11/30/the-twelve-gaffes-of-tommy/comment-page-1/#comment-16223 Zach W Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:16:42 +0000 http://bloggingblue.com/?p=7301#comment-16223 Yeah, I thought it was great. Yeah, I thought it was great.

]]> By: JeffN http://bloggingblue.com/2009/11/30/the-twelve-gaffes-of-tommy/comment-page-1/#comment-16220 JeffN Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:25:51 +0000 http://bloggingblue.com/?p=7301#comment-16220 They do think he is a threat, why would they place so much energy in him other wise. 2010 will be interesting to say the least! They do think he is a threat, why would they place so much energy in him other wise. 2010 will be interesting to say the least!

]]> By: Jim http://bloggingblue.com/2009/11/30/the-twelve-gaffes-of-tommy/comment-page-1/#comment-16217 Jim Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:04:18 +0000 http://bloggingblue.com/?p=7301#comment-16217 That video is great. "Tailgatin' Tommy" That video is great. “Tailgatin’ Tommy”

]]> By: Locke http://bloggingblue.com/2009/11/30/the-twelve-gaffes-of-tommy/comment-page-1/#comment-16215 Locke Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:06:50 +0000 http://bloggingblue.com/?p=7301#comment-16215 I'm really astonished at the premptive strikes against Thompson. I guess you guys must really think he's a threat after all. I can't see why you bother - he's not gonna run. The only thing he'd hate more than fading away is to come back and lose - and he would lose. He doesn't get the Republican nomination against Walker and though he'd probably take the primary there's no way he beat Feingold. Number 11 sounds decidedly similar to what had everybody railing for Bader's dismissal just one month ago. As a reminder: <blockquote>After all, it would take someone as classy as Jerry Bader to propagate a slanderous rumor about Lt. Gov. Barb Lawton without any type of fact-checking or verification*, opening up the possibility of legal action against WTAQ, as well as Bader himself...by Zach W</blockquote> How exactly is this different in any substantial way? I’m really astonished at the premptive strikes against Thompson. I guess you guys must really think he’s a threat after all. I can’t see why you bother – he’s not gonna run. The only thing he’d hate more than fading away is to come back and lose – and he would lose. He doesn’t get the Republican nomination against Walker and though he’d probably take the primary there’s no way he beat Feingold.

Number 11 sounds decidedly similar to what had everybody railing for Bader’s dismissal just one month ago.

As a reminder:

After all, it would take someone as classy as Jerry Bader to propagate a slanderous rumor about Lt. Gov. Barb Lawton without any type of fact-checking or verification*, opening up the possibility of legal action against WTAQ, as well as Bader himself…by Zach W

How exactly is this different in any substantial way?

]]>