Spotlight on Spending: Cut $54 Million from Congressional Office Budgets
In the second installment of Senator Russ Feingold’s “Spotlight on Spending” series, Sen. Feingold is highlighting how cutting spending on Congressional offices could help reduce the federal budget deficit:
“After the Thanksgiving feast, Americans often make a real effort to ‘tighten their belts,’” Feingold said. “In that spirit, and in the face of record deficits, Congress should do the same. Trimming congressional office budgets won’t eliminate our tremendous deficit, but it is a clear signal to the American people that we are serious about addressing our record deficit. Last month, I returned nearly $270,000 of my office budget to the Treasury. This is something I do every year and an important way for members of Congress to show leadership in curbing spending.”
Sen. Feingold’s legislation estimates a $54 million per year reduction in the federal deficit if all House and Senate office allocations were cut by five percent.
I know detractors will say, “But this only cuts $54 million! That’s just a drop in the big bucket that is the federal budget deficit!” While $54 million here and $30 million there certainly doesn’t seem like much, but it would seem to me that every little bit helps when it comes to reducing the federal budget deficit.
One Response to Spotlight on Spending: Cut $54 Million from Congressional Office Budgets
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Our Blogroll
- AFSCME Council 24 SEPAC
- Badger Blue, Times Two
- Badger Democracy
- BattiestGrrl Recalls: Putting the 'All' in 'Recall'
- blue cheddar blog
- Blue Collar Blogger
- Brett Cottrell
- Brew City Brawler
- Caffeinated Politics
- City of Contempt – The Scroll of Reason
- Cognitive Dissidence
- Constructive Debate
- Democracy Interactive
- Down With Tyranny!
- Eschaton
- Eye on Wisconsin
- FDLFVR
- Firedoglake
- First Draft
- folkbum’s rambles and rants
- Forward our Motto
- ForwardSeeking
- FoxPolitics.net
- Freak Out Nation
- freshthoughtz
- Grassroots Tosa
- Haas414
- Happy Circumstance
- illusory tenant
- Jake's Economic TA Funhouse
- Labor Chicks
- Left on the Lake
- Left Take
- Letter From Here
- Mildly Relevant
- MisLeading Wisconsin
- Moneyed Politicians
- Monologues of Dissent
- One Wisconsin Now
- Plaisted Writes
- Playground Politics
- Political Heat
- Ramona's Voices
- Red State Progressive
- Sly in the Morning
- South Milwaukee's 4th District
- The Bearded Crank
- The Blue States
- The Chief
- The Lost Albatross
- The Masses
- The Motley Cow
- The Other Side of My Mouth
- The Paul Ryan Watch
- The Plum Line
- The Political Carnival
- The Political Environment
- The Sara Schulz Show
- The World According to Nick
- Turning Over the Rocks
- Uppity Wisconsin
- Urban Milwaukee
- Waukesha Wonk
- Wisconsin Gazette
- WisPolitics.com
Watch the GAB sort through recall petitions LIVE!
Join the Discussion…
- Jake formerly of the LP on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- james booth on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- Steve Carlson on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- Steve Carlson on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- james booth on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- Zach W on The Snake that Ate the Elephant
- james booth on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- Zach W on Van Halen – Acoustic Panama 2012
- Phil Scarr on Van Halen – Acoustic Panama 2012
- Zach W on Falk to hold “Your Voice, Your Wisconsin” campaign announcement tour
- Steve Carlson on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- Phil Scarr on The Commercial
- Patricia on Karen Handel Bent on Further Destruction of the Komen Brand
- Zach W on Van Halen – Acoustic Panama 2012
- Zach W on Falk to hold “Your Voice, Your Wisconsin” campaign announcement tour
Site Login


I applaud Sen. Feingold’s efforts on this, but does he support any MAJOR spending reductions to reduce our deficits and debt? This only sets a good example if the politicians follow through on meaningful reforms. Saving $54 million is a joke when they are passing billions and trillion dollar spending and stimulus bills. After all, couldn’t it be argued that this $54 million is stimulating the economy, in the same way the other federal spending is?
This is press release fluff, on par with Obama’s mere millions in spending reductions earlier this year, after he promised a major spending overhaul during the campaign (remember that “scalpel approach” speech during the debates to end some programs?).
I’m not going to criticize reduced spending, but this is the equivalent of not buying a gumball when you can’t pay your mortgage.