Repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” imminent
By a vote of 229-186, the House of Representatives voted on Friday to support a repeal of the military’s “don’t ask don’t tell” (DADT) policy that prohibits gays from serving openly in the military, while the Senate Armed Services Committee voted 16-12 in favor of that body’s version of the change. Both versions of the repeal, which were offered as amendments to a defense spending bill, would remove DADT only after the Pentagon completes a study, due in December, on the impact of the repeal on the military. Following the vote in the House, Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-PA), who introduced the amendment, issued a statement, saying, “I will not rest until the repeal of this discriminatory policy that hurts national security is signed into law.”
It’s important to note the repeal would go into effect only after the results of the military’s study of the issue is released, with the president, the defense secretary and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff having the ultimate authority to implement repeal if and when they are satisfied that the military’s readiness, recruiting, retention and morale would not be adversely impacted by repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell.”
Speaking about the possibility of a repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” Sen. Russ Feingold issued a statement:
“We are now a couple steps closer to repealing a law that wrongly discriminates against patriotic Americans who want to serve their country. Discrimination has no place in American society, especially when it undermines our national security by hampering military readiness. I applaud my colleagues on the Senate Armed Services Committee and the House of Representatives for voting to repeal the law banning gays from the military and I look forward to an end to this harmful policy.”
A repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” is long overdue, and I’m glad lawmakers have taken action to bring a lot more equality to the United States armed forces.
8 Responses to Repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” imminent
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Watch the GAB sort through recall petitions LIVE!
Our Blogroll
- AFSCME Council 24 SEPAC
- Badger Blue, Times Two
- Badger Democracy
- BattiestGrrl Recalls: Putting the 'All' in 'Recall'
- blue cheddar blog
- Blue Collar Blogger
- Brett Cottrell
- Brew City Brawler
- Caffeinated Politics
- City of Contempt – The Scroll of Reason
- Cognitive Dissidence
- Constructive Debate
- Democracy Interactive
- Down With Tyranny!
- Eschaton
- Eye on Wisconsin
- FDLFVR
- Firedoglake
- First Draft
- folkbum’s rambles and rants
- Forward our Motto
- FoxPolitics.net
- Freak Out Nation
- freshthoughtz
- Grassroots Tosa
- Haas414
- Happy Circumstance
- illusory tenant
- Jake's Economic TA Funhouse
- Left on the Lake
- Left Take
- Letter From Here
- Mildly Relevant
- MisLeading Wisconsin
- Moneyed Politicians
- Monologues of Dissent
- One Wisconsin Now
- Plaisted Writes
- Playground Politics
- Political Heat
- Ramona's Voices
- Red State Progressive
- Sly in the Morning
- South Milwaukee's 4th District
- The Bearded Crank
- The Blue States
- The Chief
- The Lost Albatross
- The Masses
- The Motley Cow
- The Other Side of My Mouth
- The Paul Ryan Watch
- The Plum Line
- The Political Carnival
- The Political Environment
- The Sara Schulz Show
- The World According to Nick
- Turning Over the Rocks
- Uppity Wisconsin
- Urban Milwaukee
- Waukesha Wonk
- Wisconsin Gazette
- WisPolitics.com
Join the Discussion…
- Dan on Why I’d vote for Jan Pierce if I lived in the 14th Aldermanic District
- Super Id on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Zach W on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Super Id on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Super Id on Carolina Stark: Judges Matter
- Super Id on Carolina Stark edges out Walker appointee in Circuit Court race
- LikeaHawk on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- Jeff Simpson on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- LikeaHawk on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- Jeff Simpson on Verify The Recall – It’s Working
- Jeff Simpson on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Greg on Cat’s out of the bag! Secretary of State Doug La Follette plans to run for governor!
- Former Republican on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Zach W on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- Jeff Simpson on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
Site Login


Unfortunately, the House tied DADT to the F-35 engine that both Gates & Obama do not want and threatened to veto the defense bill if legislation crosses his desk including the continued funding of the F-35. (Even if it contains DADT.)
The Senate bill does not have the F-35 in it….so if passed and the bills go to reconciliation, the House engine amendment needs to be dropped and the House needs to re-vote to approve the changes.
By adding in the F-35 funding amendment, was the only way DADT passed the House with enough votes. It was done to 1) move it to the Senate for a vote and 2) to put Obama in the situation of having to veto DADT to deny funding the F-35…welcome to equality.
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2010/5/28/204454/110
Yeah, I did read that they had included the F-35 engine in the bill, so it will be interesting to see if it will be removed through reconciliation. However, even though the Senate version does not have the F-25 engine in it, I wouldn’t be surprised if it got added, because if memory serves me Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio is a proponent of the extra F-35 engine.
Yes…it is built in his state.
http://brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press_releases/release/?id=7a0a055f-409b-4e71-8537-20138af48bf8
Yeah, so like I said, it wouldn’t surprise me one bit if it ended up in the bill. This is one of those situations where a line-item veto would sure be a great thing.
A thought. Remove the words “and other purposes” that pervades every single bill put in, and force them to make bills that only have one subject in them. The majority of gays dont use jet engines on a regular basis even in the military
It’s really irritating they can link completely unrelated things in bills, but I suppose that’s politics and necessary for compromise.
aye you may be right.
But then again sticking to one subject might help the helpless
It is all grouped under the “Defense Spending Bill”. Jet engines for fighter jets and repeal DADT for military personnel.