Sen. Al Franken talks about judicial activism
Watch as Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) talks about the judicial activism of the Roberts Supreme Court:
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
opinions powered by SendLove.to
One Response to Sen. Al Franken talks about judicial activism
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Watch the GAB sort through recall petitions LIVE!
Our Blogroll
- AFSCME Council 24 SEPAC
- Badger Blue, Times Two
- Badger Democracy
- BattiestGrrl Recalls: Putting the 'All' in 'Recall'
- blue cheddar blog
- Blue Collar Blogger
- Brett Cottrell
- Brew City Brawler
- Caffeinated Politics
- City of Contempt – The Scroll of Reason
- Cognitive Dissidence
- Constructive Debate
- Democracy Interactive
- Down With Tyranny!
- Eschaton
- Eye on Wisconsin
- FDLFVR
- Firedoglake
- First Draft
- folkbum’s rambles and rants
- Forward our Motto
- FoxPolitics.net
- Freak Out Nation
- freshthoughtz
- Grassroots Tosa
- Haas414
- Happy Circumstance
- illusory tenant
- Jake's Economic TA Funhouse
- Left on the Lake
- Left Take
- Letter From Here
- Mildly Relevant
- MisLeading Wisconsin
- Moneyed Politicians
- Monologues of Dissent
- One Wisconsin Now
- Plaisted Writes
- Playground Politics
- Political Heat
- Ramona's Voices
- Red State Progressive
- Sly in the Morning
- South Milwaukee's 4th District
- The Bearded Crank
- The Blue States
- The Chief
- The Lost Albatross
- The Masses
- The Motley Cow
- The Other Side of My Mouth
- The Paul Ryan Watch
- The Plum Line
- The Political Carnival
- The Political Environment
- The Sara Schulz Show
- The World According to Nick
- Turning Over the Rocks
- Uppity Wisconsin
- Urban Milwaukee
- Waukesha Wonk
- Wisconsin Gazette
- WisPolitics.com
Join the Discussion…
- Dan on Why I’d vote for Jan Pierce if I lived in the 14th Aldermanic District
- Super Id on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Zach W on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Super Id on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Super Id on Carolina Stark: Judges Matter
- Super Id on Carolina Stark edges out Walker appointee in Circuit Court race
- LikeaHawk on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- Jeff Simpson on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- LikeaHawk on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- Jeff Simpson on Verify The Recall – It’s Working
- Jeff Simpson on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Greg on Cat’s out of the bag! Secretary of State Doug La Follette plans to run for governor!
- Former Republican on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
- Zach W on You want vote fraud? Rep. Joel Kleefisch has your vote fraud right here!
- Jeff Simpson on About Kathleen Falk’s Union Endorsements
Site Login


The thought that that guy was in the entertainment industry is just amazing to me, it’s almost hypnotic how boring he is.
Anway – I’ll admit, I haven’t read the Rent-a-center ruling or details on the case, but just pulling from what Franken said…
Are you trying to make the claim that it was a activism for the Court to honor the work contract agreed to by two parties? If so, that’s a very peculiar definition of activism.
There are certainly fools who call themselves conservatives who seem to call anything they disagree with activism. But apparently you don’t seem to have any better understanding of it. Activism is ignoring the law and replacing it’s guidance with your own opinion.
If you really want to understand what activism is, just read Breyer. His book or any of his rulings. It’s not a left/right, conservative/liberal issue. There certainly are justices on the left who don’t base their opinions on…well…making stuff up the way Breyer does. With decent judges, you cannot necessarily know their personal opinions on something based on their rulings – because it’s based on the law – or their opinion on the law. With activist justices like Breyer, you know exactly what their personal opinion on the issue is because that drives their decision. From there, having decided, “I like abortion,” “Government censorship is OK if I don’t like what those being censored are saying,” “I don’t like guns,” their arguments are twisted around however necessary to support their position. Creating new law is just a means to an end.