Vukmir gets an “F” from police organization
By Zach W On July 9, 2010 · 3 Comments · In Election 2010, News, Those Kooky Conservatives!, Wisconsin Politics
Earlier today, the Wisconsin Professional Police Association (WPPA) announced the results for its report cards for the 2009-2010 legislative session, and State Rep. Leah Vukmir (R-Wauwatosa) got a big fat “F,” scoring a miserable 33% on the WPPA’s report card.
Conversely, State Senator Jim Sullivan, who Rep. Vukmir is challenging in the 5th State Senate District, scored a rating of 86% from the WPPA, so it’ll be interesting a race between a tough on crime Democrat and a soft on crime Republican, as seems to be the case in the Vukmir/Sullivan race.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
opinions powered by SendLove.to
3 Responses to Vukmir gets an “F” from police organization
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Our Blogroll
- AFSCME Council 24 SEPAC
- Badger Blue, Times Two
- Badger Democracy
- BattiestGrrl Recalls: Putting the 'All' in 'Recall'
- blue cheddar blog
- Blue Collar Blogger
- Brett Cottrell
- Brew City Brawler
- Caffeinated Politics
- City of Contempt – The Scroll of Reason
- Cognitive Dissidence
- Constructive Debate
- Democracy Interactive
- Down With Tyranny!
- Eschaton
- Eye on Wisconsin
- FDLFVR
- Firedoglake
- First Draft
- folkbum’s rambles and rants
- Forward our Motto
- ForwardSeeking
- FoxPolitics.net
- Freak Out Nation
- freshthoughtz
- Grassroots Tosa
- Haas414
- Happy Circumstance
- illusory tenant
- Jake's Economic TA Funhouse
- Labor Chicks
- Left on the Lake
- Left Take
- Letter From Here
- Mildly Relevant
- MisLeading Wisconsin
- Moneyed Politicians
- Monologues of Dissent
- One Wisconsin Now
- Plaisted Writes
- Playground Politics
- Political Heat
- Ramona's Voices
- Red State Progressive
- Sly in the Morning
- South Milwaukee's 4th District
- The Bearded Crank
- The Blue States
- The Chief
- The Lost Albatross
- The Masses
- The Motley Cow
- The Other Side of My Mouth
- The Paul Ryan Watch
- The Plum Line
- The Political Carnival
- The Political Environment
- The Sara Schulz Show
- The World According to Nick
- Turning Over the Rocks
- Uppity Wisconsin
- Urban Milwaukee
- Waukesha Wonk
- Wisconsin Gazette
- WisPolitics.com
Watch the GAB sort through recall petitions LIVE!
Join the Discussion…
- jimspice on New Walker tool: The WisDems’ Interactive Map of Corruption
- Megan on On Obama’s SuperPAC About-Face
- james booth on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- james booth on Verify the “Verify the Recall”
- gnarlytrombone on No Recourse for Known Recall Petition Irregularities?
- james booth on No Recourse for Known Recall Petition Irregularities?
- Lisa Mux on New Walker tool: The WisDems’ Interactive Map of Corruption
- Lisa Mux on New Walker tool: The WisDems’ Interactive Map of Corruption
- Gee on New Walker tool: The WisDems’ Interactive Map of Corruption
- gnarlytrombone on No Recourse for Known Recall Petition Irregularities?
- Steven Reynolds on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- kim on No Recourse for Known Recall Petition Irregularities?
- kim on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- Steven Reynolds on Recall Petition Fraud, Tea Party Style
- Steven Reynolds on No Recourse for Known Recall Petition Irregularities?
Site Login
Glen “goofy” grothman scored a whopping 30%……
Explain why she has the endorsement of the Milwaukee Police Association and the West Milwaukee Police Association? Why West Milwaukee? What’s wrong with those officers? I’m being redundant but I’m Mortified!
I would expect her to have the endorsement of the Elm Grove or Brookfield Police Association since, per her campaign site, she touts her fundraisers/supporters in those communities. God forbid she should ever stick her big toe in West Milwaukee; that would just be a “blue collar” downer. Why associate yourself with West Milwaukee when you can be photographed with future constituents Senator Alberta Darling and former Lt.Gov. Margaret Farrow (incidentially of Pewaukee).
Neither you nor the link to the WPPA explain what the grades are based on other than candidates get points for agreeing with them. Don’t you think you should know what issues they are basing it on before you label someone soft on crime?