Another Love Letter from Notalib

From my email inbox comes another “Love Letter from Notalib.”

Enjoy!

Wow Zach only $80 so far on your beg-a-thon….if you like some help I could do some fund raising on my blog for you, I would hate to lose your blog as it is such a great source for material. Just let me know if you need me to help raise a few dollars for you, as conservatives we have plenty to toss around as we are not forced to pay union dues and make good wages.

(Bet your sorry you opened this floodgate this morning)

What is really funny, on that post you made about me it was you or someone else saying I would probably stay in contact via email and then in the end look who actually made the first contact, admit it you miss me….HEY this will be a great blog for my little site, again, Thanks for the material.

Share:

Related Articles

13 thoughts on “Another Love Letter from Notalib

  1. Who cares? I suggest we drop the whole love letters from him routine, because it’s just the same old tripe that he has spewed out on this blog for ages. It’s just giving him needless advertising that he doesn’t deserve where people will be white-knighting for him when he clearly brought it all on himself.

    I suggest we stop even talking about him. Delete his emails if you see them come in. He never applies anything of value to the conversation, where many other conservatives and independents on this blog are much more reasonable who bring up legit issues. ( LookingatLoons/Wingnut, notmyscreenname, Locke, SuperID, Annie K., and PartiallyBlue.)

      1. I apologize if I came off fairly aggressive about this, but I think by mocking him even if he is a pitiful man – we’re just giving him what he wants.

        He’s not even worth a comment other than me saying this, and I hope not to see another post about him again.

        1. No worries…I thought it was funny, but I do see your point. Best to just leave him to his own devices.

          As someone wise once told me, “Don’t feed the trolls.”

          1. But, as Moses [or was it Mel Brooks] once said: “Wisdom, smisdom. Smite the boneheaded wingnut with thy intellect at every turn, lest he be encouraged by your failure to smite him.”

          2. Zach said, “As someone wise once told me, ‘Don’t feed the trolls.’ ”

            Well, Zach, all I can say is, don’t forget the corollary: “It is, however, important to cast a bright light on their ugly, mindless, heartless stupidity, and just how much it endangers the country we love.”

            With all due respect to T, and much is due, while cross-checking Notalib may be a pain in the ass, it isn’t something to shy away from or to “rise above”. It serves a purpose.

            “How dare you publish a private e-mail”, Notalib whines. “How dare you reveal to the world just how petty and unenlightened I am by QUOTING me, by using MY OWN words,” he says as he petulantly stomps his feet.

            How dare you, indeed.

            Keep shining that light on him, Zach. He deserves it, and the world needs to know what mindlessly “passionate” wingnuts like him are all about.

            Just continue putting the information out there for all to see, and let the chips fall where they may.

    1. Jeff,

      I’ve actually had to do some real legal work over the past month and haven’t been able to comment as much as I would like.

      In response to the Prosser situation, I did post that if the allegations are true that he should absolutely resign. There is no place for that type of conduct.

    1. There’s probably an element of truth in it. But everyone involved is also a lawyer so it’s likely blown out of proportion. Our profession tends to do that.

      Personally, I’ve never met Justice Prosser, but Justice Bradley is an acquaintance of my parents and I have attended a few cocktail parties where she has been present. In my limited conversations with her she has also been very pleasant and fun.

      The current state of the court is very unfortunate. We used to have a very highly respected court but it has turned to pettiness. The tone of the decisions and dissents has gotten very acrimonious. There is no need for that type of thing.

      Imo, as Chief Justice, Abrahamson bears a lot of the blame as she has a very acerbic manner. As a jurists she is brilliant, (I supported her) but as a leader and representative of the Court she has been dismal. I would like to see Crooks be the Chief judge as he is much more personable.

  2. Picture one of the comments that Notalib was famous for posting around here, like, oh, say, THIS one from June 19th:

    “Jan [sic] you are a typical dumbocrap [sic]. Diarrhea of the mouth and nothing to say [sic]. Go back to Kentucky [sic] I am sure there must be a second cousin of yours who has a 3rd grade education and would love to have your babies.”

    (Jeez, sounds like a pretty apt self-description if you ask me.]

    Well, guess what? He has a whole blog full of similar crap.

    Anyway, Notalib posted a petty, self-serving Notalibesque blog post about Blogging Blue, about Zach and various people who post comments at Blogging Blue, like T and Steve Carlson, and about getting banned. Zach posted a responsive comment there wherein he pointed out one specific and glaring factual error. In typical Notalib fashion, Notalib ran with that as only he could, saying that because Zach had only corrected him on one thing that he MUST be conceding the balance of bullshit that Notalib had included in the post, closing with a typical, and clearly over-compensating, “Thanks for the chuckle”.

    I posted the following comment this morning after finding the blog post and comment thread under it [not too long after I did that, Notalib deleted all comments, including his own, and changed the blog post, this time around conveniently leaving out some things, like his blatant lie about where Zach lives]:

    “Notalib,

    There is a principle in the law which holds that if and when a person falsely testifies regarding one thing, a reasonable inference exists that he or she has falsely represented everything to which they have testified.

    At Blogging Blue, you were famous for ignoring facts, for twisting facts, for blatantly making up facts, and for insulting the people whom you saw as your political opponents in the most vile and infantile ways along the way.

    You post a demonstrable lie on your blog about Zach’s living arrangements for the obvious purpose of belittling him, then try to laugh off his pointing that lie out because he wasn’t inclined to deconstruct the rest of the bullshit in your post.

    Having exhaustively deconstructed the bullshit in your comment posts at Blogging Blue on a regular basis, I know how exhausting and pointless that can be. I don’t blame Zach for pointing out what he did, and then moving on.

    In any event, your laughing off his pointing out only one piece of bullshit in your post ignores the inference available to the four or five people who may have actually read the post that, if you were willing to lie about where Zach lives, then the rest of what you wrote was probably bullshit, too. It was also classic Notalib. Only you could believe the conclusion to which you came based upon the fact that Zach logged on here only long enough to say that you had misrepresented where he lived.

    Your post here, the one to which Zach responded, was exemplary of your comment posting style at Blogging Blue. The only difference was its location, and the level of intelligent and objective scrutiny it would undoubtedly [not] receive here.

    Zach, the managing editor at Blogging Blue, gave you opportunity after opportunity to post more appropriate comments there. You simply ignored his generosity in this regard.

    After running across “a little gem of conservative analysis” that you posted on June 19th, one which captured the very essence of the kind of “contribution” that you historically made around Blogging Blue, I asked Zach to take a look at it, and maybe reconsider his continuing patience with you.

    This is that “gem”:

    “Jan you are just a typical dumbocrap. Diarrhea of the mouth and nothing to say. Go back to Kentucky I am sure there must be a second cousin of yours who has 3rd grade education who would love to have your babies.”

    Notalib, you can try to blame progressive “cowardice” and the “mental illness” of liberalism all you want for your having been banned from Blogging Blue, but the reality is that it was the kind of juvenile and uncivil comments that you posted over time, like the one appearing above, that caused Zach, who had exercised extraordinary patience with you, and who had given you any number of second chances to elevate your comments to an appropriate level, to ban you.

    Whether it was the above comment that constituted the “tipping point” or something else that caused Zach to ban you, the one sure thing here is that you gave Zach every reason to say “hasta la vista, baby” to you.

    The thing that you never seemed to get is this. Your childish, insulting style served to damage the conservative “brand” around here, and, I suspect, wherever you have posted comments, your blog included.

    And it got you banned from Blogging Blue.

    A mature adult would have gotten the message. Given what I’ve read here, it is apparent to me that you still haven’t gotten it.

    God Speed, Notalib. You’re still an uniformed, infantile, fact, logic and grammar-challenged, rightwing partisan hack. Truth is, you really only hurt yourself, my misguided wingnut brother, by conducting yourself in the manner that you do.”

Comments are closed.