I stated in your previous post regarding Santorum and Rape:
“I fear libs will go vote for him tomorrow in Michigan and give him a win there.”
“Steven Reynolds says:
February 27, 2012 at 9:31 am
You forgot to say you were pro-conspiracy theory. Just back away and take off the tin foil hat slowly, mmmkay? ”
Yes, I get the humor here, and who does not love the food fight that the GOP is now engaged in?
But when you place a person in the ‘final two’ come November there is a chance–even a good chance–that events might occur that will allow the most capable to actually win. E vents from Iran to unemployment to gas prices migth develop in such a way that the nation reacts and votes Republican. At that point do we want the weakest and most bat-crap crazy as the GOP nominee, or one that is opposed to our views but rational as a person as the nominee?
This is something to be thought about and taken seriously.
Not sure what you were doing in 1979 but I know what I was saying, “No one will vote for the crazy old man from Califorina”.
But when you place a person in the ‘final two’ come November there is a chance–even a good chance–that events might occur which will allow the least capable to actually win
That was funny.
The really wonderful thing is that this strategy might be working. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/27/michigan-polls-mitt-romney-rick-santorum-election-eve_n_1304821.html?ref=politics
I stated in your previous post regarding Santorum and Rape:
“I fear libs will go vote for him tomorrow in Michigan and give him a win there.”
“Steven Reynolds says:
February 27, 2012 at 9:31 am
You forgot to say you were pro-conspiracy theory. Just back away and take off the tin foil hat slowly, mmmkay? ”
Who’s the conspiracy theorist now?
It’s not a conspiracy if they tell you that they’re doing it!
Yeah, and they were saying that they were going to do it before Steve asked me to remove my tin foil hat.
I find it hard to take anything james booth writes seriously.
what? That was funny. Admit it.
It was moronic; admit it.
It would have been funny if it was Randy Hopper…
I’m still damn proud of the role this blog played in ending Randy Hopper’s political career.
This is seriously flawed thinking.
Yes, I get the humor here, and who does not love the food fight that the GOP is now engaged in?
But when you place a person in the ‘final two’ come November there is a chance–even a good chance–that events might occur that will allow the most capable to actually win. E vents from Iran to unemployment to gas prices migth develop in such a way that the nation reacts and votes Republican. At that point do we want the weakest and most bat-crap crazy as the GOP nominee, or one that is opposed to our views but rational as a person as the nominee?
This is something to be thought about and taken seriously.
Not sure what you were doing in 1979 but I know what I was saying, “No one will vote for the crazy old man from Califorina”.
The line should read.,..and sorry for the error—
But when you place a person in the ‘final two’ come November there is a chance–even a good chance–that events might occur which will allow the least capable to actually win