Report: U.S. world leader in childhood poverty

This is absolutely disgraceful.

America’s wealth grew by 60 percent in the past six years, by over $30 trillion. In approximately the same time, the number of homeless children has also grown by 60 percent.

Financier and CEO Peter Schiff said, “People don’t go hungry in a capitalist economy.” The 16 million kids on food stamps know what it’s like to go hungry. Perhaps, some in Congress would say, those children should be working. “There is no such thing as a free lunch,” insisted Georgia Representative Jack Kingston, even for schoolkids, who should be required to “sweep the floor of the cafeteria” (as they actually do at a charter school in Texas).

The callousness of U.S. political and business leaders is disturbing, shocking. Hunger is just one of the problems of our children. Teacher Sonya Romero-Smith told about the two little homeless girls she adopted: “Getting rid of bedbugs, that took us a while. Night terrors, that took a little while. Hoarding food..”

America is a ‘Leader’ in Child Poverty

The U.S. has one of the highest relative child poverty rates in the developed world. As UNICEF reports, “[Children’s] material well-being is highest in the Netherlands and in the four Nordic countries and lowest in Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and the United States.”

Over half of public school students are poor enough to qualify for lunch subsidies, and almost half of black children under the age of six are living in poverty.

$5 a Day for Food, But Congress Thought it was Too Much.

Nearly half of all food stamp recipients are children, and they averaged about $5 a day for their meals before the 2014 farm bill cut $8.6 billion (over the next ten years) from the food stamp program.

In 2007 about 12 of every 100 kids were on food stamps. Today it’s 20 of every 100.

For Every 2 Homeless Children in 2006, There Are Now 3

On a typical frigid night in January, 138,000 children, according to the U.S. Department of Housing, were without a place to call home.

That’s about the same number of households that have each increased their wealth by $10 million per year since the recession.

The US: Near the Bottom in Education, and Sinking

The U.S. ranks near the bottom of the developed world in the percentage of 4-year-olds in early childhood education. Early education should be a primary goal for the future, as numerous studies have shown that pre-school helps all children to achieve more and earn more through adulthood, with the most disadvantaged benefiting the most. But we’re going in the opposite direction. Head Start was recently hit with the worst cutbacks in its history.

It’s hard to comprehend the thinking of people who cut funding for homeless and hungry children. It may be delusion about trickle-down, it may be indifference to poverty, it may be resentment toward people unable to “make it on their own.”

The indifference and resentment and disdain for society reach around the globe. Only two nations still refuse to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: South Sudan and the United States. When President Obama said, “I believe America is exceptional,” he was close to the truth, in a way he and his wealthy friends would never admit.

The fact that the United States is among the worst nations in the developed world in regards to childhood poverty is an absolute stain on our country.

Share:

Related Articles

6 thoughts on “Report: U.S. world leader in childhood poverty

  1. U-S-A … U-S-A…. Flag wave, increase corporate subsidies, cut social services, demonize and bomb brown people, lather, rinse, repeat.

  2. “BROWN PEOPLE”

    Take your racist code words out of here Emma… Just disgraceful.

    1. Is it as disgraceful as sucking at reading comprehension, as disgraceful as voting in the politicians who create and exacerbate the problem, or even as disgraceful as the stat itself? Just checking.

    2. nemo/denis/john/or timm who haunts the WPR threads, maybe also doing additional work here,

      Yes quite a disgraceful secret code word there, as brown actually means brown here (which covers a couple of minority groups), and a larger majority of those children (each year) are those of the white working poor or unemployed and under-employed parents. Too bad BB couldn’t have been assigned a smarter troll.

      1. OT and partly tongue-in-cheek Zach, do you allow these clowns around to drive the comment count?

        1. non, I’m not interested in driving comment counts, because the number of comments means nothing. Perhaps I’m too accommodating to conservatives, but I’ve long believed that barring some egregious violation of etiquette, there’s no need to ban folks simply because they’re conservative/moronic/stupid/all of the above.

Comments are closed.