Politico Magazine: How the NRA Rewrote the Second Amendment

This is an excellent read.

Cut to 1977. Gun-group veterans still call the NRA’s annual meeting that year the “Revolt at Cincinnati.” After the organization’s leadership had decided to move its headquarters to Colorado, signaling a retreat from politics, more than a thousand angry rebels showed up at the annual convention. By four in the morning, the dissenters had voted out the organization’s leadership. Activists from the Second Amendment Foundation and the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms pushed their way into power.

The NRA’s new leadership was dramatic, dogmatic and overtly ideological. For the first time, the organization formally embraced the idea that the sacred Second Amendment was at the heart of its concerns.

The gun lobby’s lurch rightward was part of a larger conservative backlash that took place across the Republican coalition in the 1970s. One after another, once-sleepy traditional organizations galvanized as conservative activists wrested control.

Conservatives tossed around the language of insurrection with the ardor of a Berkeley Weatherman. The “Revolt at Cincinnati” was followed by the “tax revolt,” which began in California in 1979, and the “sagebrush rebellion” against Interior Department land policies. All these groups shared a deep distrust of the federal government and spoke in the language of libertarianism. They formed a potent new partisan coalition.

Politicians adjusted in turn. The 1972 Republican platform had supported gun control, with a focus on restricting the sale of “cheap handguns.” Just three years later in 1975, preparing to challenge Gerald R. Ford for the Republican nomination, Reagan wrote in Guns & Ammo magazine, “The Second Amendment is clear, or ought to be. It appears to leave little if any leeway for the gun control advocate.” By 1980 the GOP platform proclaimed, “We believe the right of citizens to keep and bear arms must be preserved. Accordingly, we oppose federal registration of firearms.” That year the NRA gave Reagan its first-ever presidential endorsement.

Today at the NRA’s headquarters in Fairfax, Virginia, oversized letters on the facade no longer refer to “marksmanship” and “safety.” Instead, the Second Amendment is emblazoned on a wall of the building’s lobby. Visitors might not notice that the text is incomplete. It reads:

“.. the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

The first half—the part about the well regulated militia—has been edited out.

It’s funny to me that conservatives who are so fond of a strict reading of the Constitution when it comes to other hot-button political issues are the very same folks who conveniently forget the “well regulated militia” component of the Second Amendment so as to avoid gun ownership being well-regulated.


Related Articles

5 thoughts on “Politico Magazine: How the NRA Rewrote the Second Amendment

  1. They have also, conveniently, edited out the original intent of all that arms bearing and militia-regulating: the security of a free State. I don’t know if that’s because conservatives reject any source of rights that’s not “because God said so” or if the idea of the State being secure somehow offends their individualistic, anti-government ideology or the fact that times have changed to such an extent since the days of the Founders that the existence of a professional public safety apparatus — from city police to county sheriffs’ departments to State patrols to the State National Guards to the Coast Guard to the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines — that the reason for a well-regulated militia, and the right to bear arms required for it to function, no longer exists.

    Just a Second Amendment thought for the day 🙂

  2. And yet libs here still think drones are some how a firearm or something that should be banned from personal ownership. When you give up the right to police the police, you have lost your freedom. Bend over if you like, I will not.

    1. I get where we need to police the police, but I don’t think we need drones to do it, lol.

  3. Agree with you Zach, first there would have to be some “libs,” here.

Comments are closed.