As noted by Down With Tyranny! yesterday, none of Wisconsin’s three Congressmen have joined Rep. Michele Bachmann’s new Congressional Tea Party Caucus, as was reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:

None of Wisconsin’s three U.S. House Republicans has decided to join the new congressional Tea Party Caucus. Officially launched Wednesday, the group has attracted the support of at least two dozen House Republicans who say they want to harness the energy of the conservative movement.

Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner of Menomonee Falls said through a spokeswoman that he joins caucuses on a “very limited basis” given his demands in Congress as the top Republican on two committees.

Rep. Tom Petri of Fond du Lac said that although he agrees with tea party groups on a number of issues, “most are concerned about maintaining their independence from politicians and parties.”

“The Tea Party Caucus implies a formal relationship between politicians and the tea party, which I think should remain informal,” he said. “I think the right attitude is that we should talk with each other, but neither of us should try to speak for each other.”

Rep. Paul Ryan of Janesville did not explain why he hasn’t joined the caucus but says he loves the message of the tea party movement and has “been inspired by their tireless efforts to advance America’s timeless principles. It is truly grass-roots and will continue to flourish with or without an official organization in Washington.”

I get the sense that none of Wisconsin’s three Republican Congressmen will join the Tea Party Caucus because they’re simply not that stupid. In my opinion, the tea party to a large extent represents the fringe right, and while joining a Congressional tea party caucus may get them a few votes in the short term, joining could come back to bite them in the ass later on, especially someone like Paul Ryan, who likely has national ambitions.

4 Responses to Why won’t Wisconsin’s Republican Congressmen join the Tea Party Caucus?

  1. Mark says:

    What is really frightening about the Tea Party movement is that it will cause a repeat of the “divide and conquer” technique Clinton used in the 1992 & 1996 elections. Perot’s existence split the vote of the majority, who opposed Clinton. I predict the same will happen in 2012. Obama will win with about 40% of the vote, while the 60% opposing him will be split among Republicans and Tea Party supporters.

  2. Proud Progressive says:

    I would say the majority opposed clinton and Bush….everyone brings up that clinton did not get a majority of the votes and hence the majority did not want him. No one brings up that poppy Bush got even less. Also to think that 60% of the country are either republicans or “tea” party supporters overstates that percentage tremendously!

    • Mark says:

      I didn’t, and wouldn’t say that 60% of the country are Republicans or Tea Party supporters. I think that 60% of voters are anti-Obama, and their votes will get distributed over other parties. Realistically, about half of the country doesn’t vote, probably because they can’t support any of them in good conscience.

  3. Tony says:

    I really don’t care what you think will happen,if you knew you would have lots of $$ and we would not have to have an election!! I do know I’m joining the Tea Party and I will be voting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.