I knew you were “mew” from capper’s blog. So not only do you hide behind a patchwork of different aliases, you resort to copying other’s ideas. Sad.
I had so much fun leaving that comment. 🙂
I just knew you’d be by…(the predictable clown that you are).
If you call following a series of deductions “predictable,” then yes…I’m guilty as charged. Your frothing-at-the-mouth personal attack on me at capper’s blog yesterday reminded me of your tirade here at Blogging Blue. So, naturally I came here to look up your comments from a few weeks ago to see if my suspicions were correct. It’s what rational people do, Anon.
Like I said before Roland…most people know when someone is full of sh*t…and no matter how much you try to clean up after yourself you still stink.
What’s this? Where’s the link to the personal attack? Are you opposed to personal attacks? You do what to people who resort to personal attacks on BadgerBlogger? Rational series of deductions? Really?
Roland, with all due respect you’re hardly in a position to be lecturing others about “frothing-at-the-mouth” personal attacks, given the fact that you conveniently turn a blind eye to what goes on on a daily basis at Badger Blogger. What, a nasty, vitriolic personal attack is acceptable when it’s made against capper, Jay Bullock, Mike Mathias, John Foust, or myself, but if it’s made against a conservative then it’s unacceptable?
That’s called hypocrisy.
It is but I question its value.
You have no idea how much of a hate-filled nut you sound like, do you?
Almost as hate filled and nutty as your buddy Rawson?
Excellent point.
“You have no idea how much of a hate-filled nut you sound like, do you?
I’ll take ‘Things that you say after being beaten to a bloody pulp’, for $1,000, Alex.
And I was looking forward to the elections being over – that the vitriol would drop off and there might be more decent debate & discussion.
Oh well.
This sounds like a fun bunch. Maybe we all should have some coffee or beers some time.
Zach, you forgot to mention that Libertarians are also fair game at BadgerBlogger. I’ve been on the receiving end too many times myself.
Good point….I hadn’t thought of you.
That’s ok… most people don’t. 😉 Besides, I don’t even bother commenting there anymore. Haven’t for… months? I don’t even remember any more. The comments would get so vile so quickly, that it just stopped being worth the bother.
Yeah, I’ve given up trying to have anything even remotely resembling a rational discussion with anyone from BB.
So blaming me for what other people do justifies attacks on me. So, on principle, you aren’t opposed to an attack…just an attack on you or one of your buddies. Got it.
I’m not blaming you; I’m simply pointing out that you seem to have no problem turning a blind eye to the daily plethora of personal attacks lobbed by folks over at Badger Blogger.
And yes, generally I’m opposed to personal attacks.
Ask “Roland Melnick”.
I knew you were “mew” from capper’s blog. So not only do you hide behind a patchwork of different aliases, you resort to copying other’s ideas. Sad.
I had so much fun leaving that comment. 🙂
I just knew you’d be by…(the predictable clown that you are).
If you call following a series of deductions “predictable,” then yes…I’m guilty as charged. Your frothing-at-the-mouth personal attack on me at capper’s blog yesterday reminded me of your tirade here at Blogging Blue. So, naturally I came here to look up your comments from a few weeks ago to see if my suspicions were correct. It’s what rational people do, Anon.
Like I said before Roland…most people know when someone is full of sh*t…and no matter how much you try to clean up after yourself you still stink.
What’s this? Where’s the link to the personal attack? Are you opposed to personal attacks? You do what to people who resort to personal attacks on BadgerBlogger? Rational series of deductions? Really?
I see… it must be this post.
Roland, with all due respect you’re hardly in a position to be lecturing others about “frothing-at-the-mouth” personal attacks, given the fact that you conveniently turn a blind eye to what goes on on a daily basis at Badger Blogger. What, a nasty, vitriolic personal attack is acceptable when it’s made against capper, Jay Bullock, Mike Mathias, John Foust, or myself, but if it’s made against a conservative then it’s unacceptable?
That’s called hypocrisy.
It is but I question its value.
You have no idea how much of a hate-filled nut you sound like, do you?
Almost as hate filled and nutty as your buddy Rawson?
Excellent point.
“You have no idea how much of a hate-filled nut you sound like, do you?
I’ll take ‘Things that you say after being beaten to a bloody pulp’, for $1,000, Alex.
And I was looking forward to the elections being over – that the vitriol would drop off and there might be more decent debate & discussion.
Oh well.
This sounds like a fun bunch. Maybe we all should have some coffee or beers some time.
Zach, you forgot to mention that Libertarians are also fair game at BadgerBlogger. I’ve been on the receiving end too many times myself.
Good point….I hadn’t thought of you.
That’s ok… most people don’t. 😉 Besides, I don’t even bother commenting there anymore. Haven’t for… months? I don’t even remember any more. The comments would get so vile so quickly, that it just stopped being worth the bother.
Yeah, I’ve given up trying to have anything even remotely resembling a rational discussion with anyone from BB.
So blaming me for what other people do justifies attacks on me. So, on principle, you aren’t opposed to an attack…just an attack on you or one of your buddies. Got it.
I’m not blaming you; I’m simply pointing out that you seem to have no problem turning a blind eye to the daily plethora of personal attacks lobbed by folks over at Badger Blogger.
And yes, generally I’m opposed to personal attacks.